Friday, April 17, 2009

Official Gowanus Superfund Statement From Councilman Bill DeBlasio

oo



Below is the official statement from our Councilmember Bill DeBlasio regarding the nomination of the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund. His District Manager Tom Gray sent it to me yesterday.


“For years I have supported cleaning up the Gowanus Canal but I
believe to make real progress we need to involve the community. The
health and safety of the surrounding residents has always been my
number one concern. I still believe local economic projects are an
essential part of the cleanup effort. As the public offers feedback
over the next two months, the Federal and Local Government must work together with the community to find the best way to clean up the
canal," said Councilmember Bill de Blasio.


The part about involving the community sounds great to me. That wasn't always the case.

What's your opinion, dear Reader?




13 comments:

Anonymous said...

By "community" de Blasio means the developers. De Blasio has never given a damn about what the real community, the residents, want. I am not at all surprised that, hidden behind his fuzzy political words, he is against the Superfund clean-up of the canal.

Anonymous said...

My opinion is that for Bill, the "community" consists of Scotto&Friendsand developers. Bill could give a rat's patoutie about the health and safety of the current and anticipated surrounding residents.
Bill will spend the next couple of months with his finger in the wind while he determines which way it is blowing as people submit their comments to the EPA. His statement is purposely vague but my interpretation is that he trusts the luxury condo builders to clean the canal even if it won't be done to the same standard as the EPA's. The developers aren't going to dredge.
Luckily for those who support the clean up, as Walter Mudgen said,this is not a popularity contest and the Obama Administration has made urban renewal and Superfund funding an agenda priority.

When it comes to Gowanus, Bill is a Republican.

Anonymous said...

Ditto the first two commenters. DeBlasio is so wishy-washy and unprincipled, he won't even stand behind the developers who have donated to him, let alone the actual community who live here now.

Anonymous said...

I too think Bill De Blasio is trying to play it safe to see where the chips fall, but hey, at least he isn't actively opposing the listing of the canal, like the shameless Bloomberg administration. The Toll Brothers contingent has been SO heavy handed and thuggish in their attack on the EPA that they've put their politician-supporters like Bill in a tight spot. How can he argue that development comes before protection of human health and the environment, which is essentially the Toll Brothers' position? Eventually the canal will probably be listed since that is the only rational outcome, and the only way the canal will actually get cleaned up, and then Bill will run around holding meetings and so forth, to show that he's keeping an eye on the EPA to make sure it doesn't screw things up.

Anonymous said...

Bill is going to listen to the community as long as its his community of developers. Why would he now listen to the residents of the community who live/work and play in Carroll Gardens, only because its an easy way out. He can sit on the sidelines and let the Feds do what is needed and then take the credit. Just like he has done for the past seven years.

Anonymous said...

As said by "8:06 AM" , de Blasio has "his finger in the wind"...
Hope that the wind does not come from the canal after a storm when the sewer overflows.

Anonymous said...

de Blasio has laid out the opposition game plan here: "over the next two months, the Federal and Local Government must work together with the community to find the best way to clean up the canal," said Councilmember Bill de Blasio.

Now we know he isn't asking the EPA to come up with a cleanup plan in the next two months because the EPA doesn't start the planning until after designation. What he is calling for is some kind of compromise plan other than Superfund to be agreed on before comment period closing. The current tactic now is to drum fear into all the local residents so that they believe they will get a better deal out of the "compromise cleanup plan" than they will under Superfund.

It's so interesting to now see the city scramble to make a cleanup plan after years of avoiding any comprehensive approach to cleaning the canal. The city has had more than 30 years to bring the Gowanus into compliance with the Clean Water Act--and the current mayor has had 8 of those 30 years--and now we are to believe that they will pull together a workable plan over the next two months? And more galling, the city’s opposition to Superfund cleanup is over how long it might take!

Anonymous said...

12:29 You are right! He is going to join the City and the Toll boys in pressuring EPA not to finalize the listing. Anyone who wants to know how well a site gets cleaned up when it is held back from getting listed on the Superfund national priority list can look to some recent examples in NJ. Usually a few years pass, nothing happens, and it ends up getting listed anyway. Then everyone complains that it took EPA too long to do the cleanup. Meanwhile, the politicians who meddled with the listing in the first place are long gone, either in jail, on wall street, or some such other locale.

Anonymous said...

If the City really had a plan there would have been a press conference or a big presentation. Neither Bill nor Mike are ones to miss a photo op.

Anonymous said...

This posted statement of DeBlasio does not say anything. Its wishy-washy double-talk which doesnt answer the question it allegedly addresses.
Bill its simple - SuperFund status, yes or no?

Anonymous said...

DeBlasio's definition of community is:
Scotto, Scotto and their growing number of well planted drones at CB 6.

Bill NEVER answers "yes" or "no" to anything.

It's not even worth the time trying to understand his gobble-dee-gook.

Anonymous said...

The combination of Bloomie's new "supposedy green NYC" election year stance and a Bloomie-DeBlasio-Toll Brothers half-assed clean up of a dangerous, carcinogenic canal bodes badly for any election year success of:

Bloomie and or dee BeBLAH sio

Everyone knows lobbyists and big bucks are involved and that they will try to bury any real science in the muck of the canal.

How awful! The trouble is: Will anyone ever buy those condos? Highly doubtful. The word is out far and wide already. No one in their right mind will raise a family in those condos.

The Toll Bros should just let the Feds clean up THEN after that, they build. Just common sense here. If they persist in their current, greedy stance, it will surely come back to haunt them with lawsuits later. The bad karma has already begun.

Anonymous said...

Bill stated concern for the public health hear must mean that he wants the EPA Superfund effort to focus on the health study portion of the Superfund cleanup.
It seems that he is clearly calling for a health study.