(Photo Credit: The Evening Standard)Brooklynites, take note. We complain quite a bit about loosing all of our neighborhood stores and the reckless over-development of our fair borough. However, we don't seem to back up our kvetching with action. Not so in London, or more precisely Notting Hill . People there are taking to the streets to protest the closing of a Woolworths. (A Woolworths! Imagine! I used to love those stores. I can't believe that they are still around.) The reason for the demo? Residents are afraid that developers are going to tear down the beloved neighborhood store to build, what else, something overpriced or useless to the community. That's what we need more of here in Brooklyn: Some good old fashioned activism. How about it! Any store closings we can protest? I'll make the banners if you design the fliers.
Locals' bid to save Notting Hill's Woolworths
Evening Standard 09.11.07Residents and shopkeepers in Notting Hill are to stage a demonstration today over the future of their local Woolworths store.
They are concerned the freeholders of the site, UK Investments, will demolish the Portobello Road store once the lease expires in June 2009.
Woolworths has stood on the site since 1928 and locals, particularly small shop owners who are already under pressure from rising rents, want it to remain.
In February, Kensington and Chelsea Liberal Democrats discovered that JMW Barnard, the managing agents for UK Investments, were in talks with the council over planning permission to redevelop as flats the entire Woolworths block when the lease expires.
Lib-Dem chairman Robin Meltzer said the news caused "uproar" but when the agents heard
this they said the plans had been shelved.
Mr Meltzer claimed the decision was only made due to pressure from the local community and said that until a new lease was signed which guaranteed Woolworths would remain, the campaign would continue, including the demonstration outside the store this afternoon.
JMW Barnard has said the protest is unnecessary because it has stated the firm wants to keep Woolworths open. But Mr Meltzer said: "UK Investments are not obliged to renew the lease and they could change their mind and decide to go ahead with the redevelopment.
"They've already proved they are capable of this sort of plan and then shelved the idea. What's to say they won't change their mind again?
"Although we welcome JMW Barnard's newly professed love for the Woolworths store, we must ensure their talk is turned into action.
"The public demonstration is intended to send a loud message - not just to UK Investments but to all 'super-landlords' - that local people do not want much-used local stores to be replaced by buildings that will have little or no use for them."
For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking
.JPG)
4 comments:
Some good stuff is coming:
Trader joe
Some old stuff needs/needed to be discontinued:
blockbuster, benjamin paints store,
Stuff we need to keep:
The court street movie theater
and most of the restaurants!
Stuff we don't really care:
Rite Aid, American Apparel
And we need the "Banania" restaurant back!!!
Some more stuff we don't need:
Starbuck's
Dunkin Donuts
CVS
All Banks except maybe one
Stuff we need to keep
Caputo's Bakery with the little old bickering ladies behind the counter
Hole In the Wall, for when Netflix's just doesn't arrive on time
Winn's Discount Store because they carry everything (someplace in the store)
Stores I would like to welcome back:
Francis, the little old fruit seller across from the former key food. (Sadly her sons did not carry on when Francis died.)
Renaissance Pharmacy
And the one store I would really morn if it ever closed: Sahadi's
( Actually, I think I would be depressed for weeks.)
I live on Portobello Road and have to say that I think Woolworths is one of the ugliest and most depressing shops on the street. It would be much better if it was redeveoped with apartments above it. In the UK, people are always complaining that there isn't enough property to buy, but if anyone tries to build property, everyone seems to be against it. Portobello is a great place to live, so I don't see the problem of having apartments above a decent new store.
The 'locals' of the area mostly priced out the last lot of locals from the 1980s. They are now worried that the same will happen to them. They weren't too worried when they had the upper hand though.
Hello Portobello Road,
What you describe sounds very much like the discussions happening all over Brooklyn.
Too often, new development only adds housing stock for more affluent residents. This raises the rents for everybody else including mom and pop stores. It sets in motion an exodus of the residents who made a neighborhood unique and varied in the first place.
Eventually, what was a special area of a city becomes sterile and without character.
Your Woolworth may be ugly, but if it serves the neighborhood, maybe that's worth more than having a big new apartment building?
Here in Carroll Gardens, we are loosing most of our local stores to restaurants, bars and expensive chain stores.
They seem to be the only ones able to afford the raising rents.
Post a Comment