Thursday, June 05, 2008

Carroll Gardens Testifies In Front Of City Planning: "A Neighborhood Worth Fighting For"

oo





"The Soul Of The Neighborhood Is Speaking Before You"


Oscar Jonas of State Senator Marty Connor's Office

Testifying in front of the City Planning Commission


Wearing matching yellow "Preserve Carroll Gardens. Downzone Now!" buttons to show unity,
residents of Carroll Gardens gave passionate testimony in front of the City Planning Commission in regard to the Wide Street Text Amendment. The hearing room was filled to capacity. For two and a half hours, Commissioner Amanda Burden and the other members of the commission listened attentively as one speaker after the next spoke about how important it is to preserve Carroll Gardens. In advance of a full rezoning, the neighborhood is asking
the Department of Planning to correct an error in classifying the unique Place Blocks as “wide streets” which provides a loophole for developers. Under the present zoning definition, the front gardens are counted as part of the street, though the actual street is narrow. This distinction provides a development bonus in the form of a higher F.A.R.. The proposed Zoning Resolution Amendment addresses this error.
Residents argued that the Place Blocks, first planned in 1846 by surveyor Richard Butts, are the "jewel of the neighborhood" and are still basically intact. However, developers have increasingly used the loophole to build out-of-context buildings which destroy the historical context of these garden blocks.
Insisting that they chose to make their houses their homes and that they feel under siege by developers, residents made the point that the wide street loophole is exploited by a few at the expense of many.

Of course there were those who argued against the Zoning Text Amendment. Citing that the Amendment will do more harm than good and will fail to protect the neighborhood, opponents urged the Commission not to rush into a decision. They also asked that City Planning settle once and for all the question of who owns the front yards of the place blocks in question: the city or the home owner.
The complaint that the neighborhood had not been sufficiently notified of the Wide Street Text Amendment was merely a distraction. Both Councilman Bill De Blasio's office as well as local organizations such as the Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association and C.O.R.D. had extensively distributed literature. Besides, the community board and the Borough President's office have held lengthy hearings before approving it. Overwhelmingly, the community urged City Planning to pass the amendment as soon as possible. Lets hope their voices will be heard.




Speaking For The Zoning Text Amendment

*Kevin Parris for Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz

*Maryann Young, resident

*Lucy DeCarlo, resident

*Liam Veuve for Triada Samaras, resident

*Vincent Joseph, Resident,
Union-Sackett Block Association Member

*June Negrycz
Cobble Hill Association Member

*Jim Devor, resident

*Vince Favorito, resident
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member


*Glenn Kelly, resident,
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member

*Mike Salvatore, resident

*Linda Eskenas
Four Boroughs Neighborhood Preservation Memberg

*Daniel Squadron,resident
Union-Sackett Block Association Member
New York State Senate Candidate

*Ken Baer
City Council Candidate
Candidate

*Eunice Auer, resident

*Gary Reilly, resident,
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member
City Council Candidate

*Rita Miller, resident
C.O.R.D. Member

*Mary Mattner, resident
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association

*Linda Blyer, Cobble Hill resident
For Diane Buxbaum, resident

*Colleen Giunta, resident

*Oscar Jonas for State Senator Marty Connor

*Tom Gray for Councilman Bill DeBlasio

*Barbara Brookhart, resident
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member

*Anthony Marchese, resident
American Institute Of Architects Member

*Craig Hammerman
District Manager, Community Board Six
City Council Candidate

*John Hatheway, resident, architect
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member

*Maria Pagano, resident
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association President


For, With A Plea For Developer Bill Stein


*
Buddy Scotto,resident
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association Member
Carroll Gardens Association Member
Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation Member


Speaking Against The Zoning Text Amendment

* Lawyer For Bill Stein
Developer of Oliver House, 360 Smith Street/ 131 2nd Place

*Deborah Scotto, resident
Developer
Community Board 6 Member

*Judith Thompson, resident
Community Board 6 Member (as of June 2008)

* Peter Pober, resident

Undecided

*Michael DeMeglio





For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

2 comments:

the kid said...

out of context
mow, that's something i've been thinking lately
that maybe things are misinterpreted or misunderstood to gain support for someone's own goal

go to the wikipedia


Fallacy of quoting out of context
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Out of context)• Find out more about navigating Wikipedia and finding information •Jump to: navigation, search
This article or section is written like a personal reflection or essay and may require cleanup.
Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (April 2008)

The practice of "quoting out of context", sometimes referred to as "contextomy," is a logical fallacy and type of false attribution in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning. Quoting out of context is often a means to set up "straw man" arguments. Straw man arguments are arguments against a position which is not held by an opponent, but which may bear superficial similarity to the views of the opponent. [1]

Anonymous said...

Hey Kid,
Yes there is potential for discourse on the points of logic and correct usage.(Homage to William Safire)
Given it's application to land use, I would add that this particular phrase, OOC, has been publicly addressed by architects as being incorrect. As I understand it there is no such thing as OOC to an architect.
Not being an architect, the words work for how it looks to me.
The blocked view and shadows aren't in context to me when I am looking at a row of brownstones and the skyline is interrupted by a bigger,bulkier new building.
Should I be more careful? What subterfuge do you imply, should I use the phrase OOC to describe what I see?

BklynMom