Wednesday, May 27, 2009

State Senator Squadron Announces He Is FOR Gowanus Superfund Designation!

oo
GowanusWhale





State Senator Daniel Squadron at last month's EPA Superfund meeting


Great News! Yesterday, State Senator Daniel Squadron announced that he is
for the Gowanus Canal Superfund designation.

Daniel Squadron and his staff had hinted last week that the State Senator was about to issue a statement regarding the EPA's proposal to include the Gowanus Canal to its list of Superfund sites. After meeting with the city as well as with the EPA, the State Senator came to an informed conclusion. Here is his statement:



On April 8, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it had nominated the Gowanus Canal for consideration to be added to the National Priorities List (NPL), more commonly known as the Superfund list. If added to the NPL, the Gowanus would be entered into the EPA's cleanup program, which would include intensive study and analysis of the nature of the hazardous materials and pollutants within the canal, identification of the parties that have been responsible for the pollution, and a supervised cleanup.

Though the pressure to immediately announce a position on this issue was great, this is an enormously complex issue that cannot be decided based on headlines alone; the decisions we make now will have profound, long-ranging consequences for the local community and the effort to clean and revitalize the Gowanus. Given the gravity of such a designation, my staff and I have been working to fully understand the impact that Superfund designation would have for the canal, including the water, the silt and upland portions, and the health and welfare of the community. I investigated sites from around the country, evaluating where a Superfund designation has led to progress and where communities have succeeded with the Superfund Alternative Approach. I met and spoke with the relevant agencies, as well as Gowanus area residents, community organizations and Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).

Over the course of these meetings, several parties indicated their belief that the Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) program, also administered and managed by the EPA, might better achieve a positive outcome. I have concluded that while the SAA has proven to be a useful alternative for sites where there are one or two PRPs, in the case of the Gowanus it is highly unlikely that all of the PRPs will be easily identifiable, or will voluntarily accept responsibility. I also am not convinced that the SAA will guarantee the same transparency, leverage and long-term comprehensive outcomes as the Superfund program. Of course, any scenario, including the SAA, that offered additional federal dollars while meeting the standards of Superfund would be ideal. However, the burden in ensuring that such an alternative would in fact match Superfund's benefits, and bring added value, is high.

For this reason and others, I support listing the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund site. Based on the conversations I have had and the commitments that have been made, I have concluded that listing the Canal on the NPL is the best strategy for achieving a comprehensive and timely cleanup of the canal and the sources of its contamination. Superfund designation would deliver appropriate oversight to the EPA, which has a unique ability to work with other levels of government, PRP's and the community to address a complicated site like the canal.

To continue reading statement, click here


Well done, Senator Squadron!

Let's hope that some of our other elected officials will finally come the fence or change their minds regarding the Superfund designation as well. How about it, Councilman De Blasio?



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, it's about time.

Hello? Joan? Your constituents would like to hear your position on the Superfund.

I think we all know where Bill stands but he really should release an official statement.

Anonymous said...

This is an excellent statement, not lip service, no platitudes, but well-informed, thoughtful and informative for the rest of us. Usually it's we, the community, that is way more informed than the politicians and they rarely catch up with us or reflect our concerns. Congratulations, Daniel and your staff, on an excellent statement.

Mary

Lisanne said...

I was extremely happy to hear this news, finally a rational politician with a conscience.

I do not think the city's plan with the voluntary PRB's will work. Too complicated.

Superfund Gowanus! And thank you Senator Squadron!

Anonymous said...

Dear Senator Squadron:

Thanks for your thoughtful statement. You've been pressured from all sides on this - what a way to begin your term. Your support is truly valued!