Friday, November 06, 2009

Some Work Resumes At Clarett Site On Court Street, Despite Recent Stop Work Order

oo




Proposed 340 Union Street development


proposed town houses on Sackett Street


Neighbors of the Clarett Goup's 340 Court Street site informed me this week that work had resumed behind the blue construction fence. When workers were asked what was happening, the neighboring residents were told that Clarett was proceeding with the planned townhouses on Union and Sackett Streets.


As the photos I was sent clearly show, a bulldozer was moving dirt on Union Street. And just recently, the construction crew shored up the diagonal iron beams that hold the foundation on both the Union and Sackett sides, especially the side next to the Apple Back building.

Designed by architect Rob Rogers, of the firm Rogers Marvel, the Clarett Group development includes 4 townhouses on both Sackett and Union Streets, 3 Maisonettes towards Court and a 70 foot building on Court.
Back in April 2008, when Clarett presented their plans for 340 Court Street to a less than enthusiastic crowd here in Carroll Gardens, the developer estimated that construction on their Collection On Court project would take about 18 months to complete. That was, of course, before the downturn in the economy. Construction came to a sudden halt in November 2008.

Since then, the site has been dormant. But just in the last few weeks, there has been a flurry of activity. At the end of October, however, the NYC Buildings Department has issued a Complete Stop Work Order.
The paperwork states:

INSPECTION FOR VESTING REGARDING CARROLL GARDENS ZONING CHANGE EFFECTIVE 10/28/09. Job considered not vested.

This has to do with the neighborhood zoning change that was just passed by the City Council. The DoB needs to inspect the site to see if the development's foundation has been substantially completed, in order to proceed with the proposed plans. The Stop Work Order was serve on Tuesday, November 3rd.

However, the work has not stopped completely. As one of the site's neighbor writes:
"The stop work order says they can go in there to make things safer. I'm sure if an inspector came by they could figure out something that they're doing to call it such. So awful! (No hard hats on any of the workers.)"

That doesn't come as a surprise. What is more astonishing is that the work is moving ahead at all, especially in these economic times.




For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

DOB is out of control! The photos show a completed foundation. Does DOB think that's a swimming pool?

I have no love for this building but forcing every developer to purchase a BSA variance (which they always get) just means our community is stuck with a giant pit for another two years!

Raised in Carroll Gardens said...

Of course they have to build, so Carroll Gardens can gain some more Rent Poor neighbors.

Landlords (old & new) push-out and/or price-out elderly people and jack up the rents so high that 1 bedroom places are being shared by 3 or 4 people at a time.

However, these "kids" (and I really do feel sorry for them, just starting out after college) are so broke after paying thier rent that they can't enjoy their over-priced neighborhood.

I've written in the past about the 3 "kids" who wanted to share 1 canoli at Court Pastry. About the 4 "kids" who wanted to share 1 plate of Pasta at the Red Rose. I've seen it happen & have overheard similar conversations.

Maybe we should welcome these "kids" into our homes and fix them a nice dinner, every so often. Maybe if they were better fed and had a little scratch left in thier pockets perhaps they would make better neighbors? You never know!

Anonymous said...

Hi Katia - after the fiasco at 360 Smith Street - there is not a snowman's chance in hell this site won't get vesting.
G

Anonymous said...

If this project does need to go through a community re-assessment process, that part of our community that has been working so hard to bring affordable, and senior housing to Carroll Gardens should do all they can to get an agreement with THIS developer to provide for these community needs.

In all reality, these needs will not be met by the plans to build on Public Place site--which is still a long way from achieving any measure of an environmental cleanup.

Local advocates for senior housing (along with our elected officials who promote themselves as advocates for affordable housing) should show their sincerity on this issue by taking this opportunity to negotiate with the Court St Clarett development.