Lander's "new" position proves that the position taken by the CB's Land Use Committee WAS correct and that the Board at it's regular monthly meeting should have supported its own committee. why they didn't and who was pulling the Board member's strings is something that this community should know.
.JPG)
1 comment:
Follow the money... who on that CB 6 Board is connected to pushing the dense residential development along the canal. Who owns property on its banks? or is connected to people who do? who are pushing for this vision - and Lighthouse would have set a very powerful precedent to their agenda!
Full Disclosure Needed!
Post a Comment