Showing posts with label Yvette Clarke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yvette Clarke. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Congresswoman Yvette Clarke Still Straddling The Fence Regarding Gowanus Superfund

Monday night at Christ Church


Congresswoman Yvette Clarke

Cobble Hill Association President Roy Sloane

Yvette Clarke with her local representative Deanna Bitetti (left)
Gowanus Resident and Pro-Superfund activist Betty Lester







For its first Community Roundtable with our local elected officials, the Cobble Hill Association
hosted Congresswoman Yvette Clarke on Monday evening at the Christ Church on Clinton Street.

After an introduction by Roy Sloane, president of the Cobble Hill Association, Ms. Clarke spoke at length about the nearly $38 million in federal appropriations dollars for the 11th Congressional District of New York, which she has been able to secure. She also updated the community on her work on the various House committees and sub-committees she has been assigned to.

On her work on the Health Care Reform Committee, she stated that she is not encouraged by the plan proposed by the Senate, because it lacks a public option. She also feels that the proposal does not put enough emphasis on preventive care, and would leave the system open to runaway cost. "It baffles me how they expect to contain cost. The Senate left the door open for the 'wolves' to continue feeding the way they have."

On the economy and on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Clarke talked about the need to stabilize and strengthen local businesses, the staggering unemployment rate and the proposed measures to spur the creation of new jobs.


On Homeland Security, and the recent breaches in airline security, she explained that bureaucracy is very slow to change and that we must be "more dynamic in the use of tools put in place to keep us safe."


On education, she is in favor of expanding programs in early childhood development and in investing to bolster college access to students. We need to "improve productivity for the future by investing in our children."


Congresswoman Clarke also spoke about the Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to place the highly toxic Gowanus Canal on its list of Superfund Sites. (See video)
After more than eight months of her staff's claim of due-diligence and New York City's opposing plans for cleaning the Gowanus Canal, our Congresswoman has managed to reach no decision. She merely hides behind the tired claim that the Superfund does not have enough money, while admitting that the city has even less. What can she be thinking?

Claiming that "she saw no integrity in the EPA process because it is not funded" and that "the EPA has not connected the dots" to make her support the Superfund listing, Ms. Clarke clearly angered and exasperated many in the audience, including me.
It was frankly baffling how Ms. Clarke intends to continue straddling the fence on this issue, when most of our other local officials, including Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez, have come out in support for the Superfund listing. Explaining away her indecision by claiming that "I am a conflict resolution person" is frankly amateurish.

If this is an example of her abilities in representing her constituents then we can do better.



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Cobble Hill Association To Host A Community Roundtable Meeting With Congresswoman Yvette Clarke

Congresswoman Yvette Clarke

IMG_7249

Important Environmental Issue In Congresswoman Clarke's District:
The Gowanus Canal


The Cobble Hill Association will host roundtable meeting with Congresswoman Yvette Clarke on Monday, January 11th to discuss various issues pertaining to her district and will
provide an opportunity for members of the community to take their concern directly to Congresswoman Clarke. The meeting will be free of charge and open to all.

I would like to thank the Cobble Hill Association and its president Roy Sloane for organizing the event.
I will certainly be in attendance. I believe that Congresswoman Clarke owes her constituents an explanation for her failure to take a stand on the proposed listing of the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund site. She has been tiptoeing around the issue for months claiming she is doing due-diligence. As opposed to Congresswoman Velázquez's strong pro-Superfund statement, Ms. Clarke's fence-sitting has been deplorable.

I had lengthy conversations with the Congresswoman's staff about this very important environmental issue and hope to have an opportunity to finally hear directly from Ms. Clarke.


Cobble Hill Association's Community Round-Table Meeting
with Congresswoman Yvette Clark

Monday, January 11th

7:30PM
Christ Church
326 Clinton Street
(at the corner of Clinton and Kane Streets)



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more

Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Congresswoman Velázquez: "Make The Right Decision And Designate Gowanus Canal A Superfund Site."

IMG_1399



Thank You, Congresswoman Velázquez!

I am sure most of you have seen this op-ed piece by Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez which appeared in the Daily News Brooklyn section on Tuesday, but just in case you have not, I am posting it here.

Velázquez has been an outspoken supporter of the EPA Superfund designation for the Gowanus Canal. She was also the first representative who put in question the feasibility and funding sources for the City's Alternative plan.

In this op-ed piece she clearly asks for the Gowanus Canal to be listed.

(Hear that, Congresswoman Clarke?)




OP-ED: Gowanus needs Superfund status to ensure restoration

New York Daily News – Brooklyn Insert

December 8, 2009

by Rep. Nydia Velázquez


The Gowanus Canal has earned its place in the pages of Brooklyn history. First a creek and later expanding into a canal, it served as a hub for New York’s Industrial Revolution.

Even today, Gowanus stands at the core of local industry. It is an integral thread in the fabric of our community, and has been referred to as "the Jewel of Brooklyn."

Neighborhoods like Park Slope and Carroll Gardens could not have been built without its waters, which ferried wood, brick and brownstone from New Jersey and the Upper Hudson. With its location just steps away from the homes of thousands of New York families, it is critically important that we protect the canal and restore integrity to its waters.

Pollution within Gowanus is not a new problem. Brooklynites have been calling for its cleanup since the 1880’s and, by 1911, Mayor William Jay Gaynor activated a flushing tunnel.

Today, several suggestions have been made for its remediation.

One proposal by the Mayor’s office, which came to light after the EPA’s Superfund nomination, would use federal funding through the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). But those dollars are already vastly overextended.

In fact, the Army Corps of Engineers has a WRDA backlog of more than 1,000 projects, totaling $61 billion. Gowanus, if approved for WRDA funding, would go straight to the back of that 1,000 project line.

The canal wasn’t contaminated overnight, and it won’t be cleaned overnight, either.

In reversing decades of pollution, there is no such thing as a quick fix solution. At this point, the best thing we can do is identify a timely, effective plan moving forward--a plan that ensures a clean future for South Brooklyn, and requires polluting parties to pay their share of remediation.

That’s why I worked to secure funding for a study to identify methods for restoring the canal. And that’s why I am calling upon the EPA to designate Gowanus as a Superfund site.

The Superfund program was established as a means for cleaning the country’s most hazardous waste sites. Since its inception, it has helped restore many of our nation’s most polluted areas. With $1.89 billion in authorized funding for 2009, the Superfund budget dwarfs that of the Army Corps. And, unlike WRDA, EPA resources don’t depend on tax payer dollars alone.

Rather, the agency has the authority to recoup costs from polluters. That means the large corporations that contributed to Gowanus’s contamination will help pay for its remediation. That seems fair.

Despite its clear benefits, not everyone is in favor of Superfund status. Real Estate developers argue that the term "Superfund" carries too much of a stigma. They are worried that the name alone will curb consumers’ appetite for luxury condos in South Brooklyn.

But is a Superfund site, by any other name, less polluted? The fact of the matter is, Gowanus Canal is toxic--whether it’s deemed a Superfund or not. As New Yorkers, we need to be focused on restoring Gowanus and protecting Brooklyn families, not bickering over semantics.

With the comment period for Superfund status now closed, the EPA has an opportunity to complete its review. I urge the agency to make the right decision and designate Gowanus a Superfund site. Doing so will ensure the canal is cleaned up in a safe, timely, cost effective manner.

Brooklyn deserves no less.



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Tell Congresswoman Yvette Clarke That You Want The Gowanus Canal Listed As A Superfund Site

IMG_0913


A message to our politicians:

If You Are Against The EPA's Superfund Clean-Up Of The

Gowanus Canal,

You Aren't Green At All!




Dear Reader,
Together with the Coalition For Respectful Development (C.O.R.D.), I am urging everyone to continue to plead with our elected officials to allow science to prevail over politics in the health issue of our day:


The Superfunding Of The Gowanus Canal

Following on the heels of last Friday's announcment that Representative Nydia Velazquez is indeed supporting the SUPERFUND designation of both the Gowanus Canal and Newton Creek, we here at CORD are urging our readers to PLEASE! now write to Congresswoman Yvette Clarke. Rep. Clarke is another one of our elected officials who needs to hear from her constituents about how important this Superfund Designation is to our health and safety during the clean-up of this highly contaminated canal. Our very health is at stake as the clean-up method for the Gowanus Canal is decided. The EPA has promised to do the most comprehensive and SAFE clean up of these toxins possible and to hold the polluters NOT the taxpayers responsible.


Please sign, cut,paste and send the letter below to Congresswoman Clarke ASAP!
( **see instructions below**)
.




Dear Congresswoman Clarke: 


We are residents of the Gowanus area. 
 
Our neighborhoods may have different names such as Carroll Gardens or Park Slope, but we are the people whose lives are touched every single day by the deplorable condition of the Gowanus Canal. 
 


We are the people who applauded Commissioner Grannis's request to nominate this open sewer to the National Priorities List. 
 


We are the people who signed a petition in support of that nomination. 
 


We are the people who attended the multiple meetings held in our community. 
 


We are the people who obediently sent in our comments to the Environmental Protection Agency in the prescribed, timely manner and we are the people who have been waiting patiently for science and common sense to lead our Canal into the healthier life the Superfund designation would offer us all. 
 


We are the people who are beginning to strongly feel that what residents want is of no importance; that the desires of those who stand to benefit financially somehow trumps the health of those who inhabit the area. 



We are your constituents. Our pro designation comments represent the majority and we ask that you speak on our behalf. 
 


The Gowanus Canal must be added to the National Priorities List. It must be designated a Superfund site. 
 


Work must begin with the sole motivation of improving public health and the environment. 
 
No other plan, no other dream, no other ambition is more important.

No other course of action should be permitted to take precedence over the health of Gowanus area residents and our children. 
 
The EPA indicated in those community meetings that they are ready, willing and able to proceed. 
 


We are the people. Represent us, please. Call E.P.A. Administrator Lisa Jackson

Signed, XXXXX

Address: XXXXX



To send email to Congresswoman Clarke, go here:




***P.S.***

If you have not done so already please also copy, paste and sign the letter above and email to the President, the Governor, and both Senators.***


For President Obama
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

For Governor Paterson
http://161.11.121.121/govemail

For Senator Schumer,

http://schumer.senate.gov/new_website/contact.cfm

For Senator Gillibrand,

http://gillibrand.senate.gov/contact/




For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more

Friday, October 16, 2009

Velázquez Urges Superfund Designation for Gowanus Canal And Newtown Creek


****News Flash****

“Securing a healthy environment for New York City families is the single most important factor in choosing a course of action for cleaning both the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek."
Nydia Velázquez
Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez is the latest elected official to release a pro-EPA Superfund statement for the Gowanus Canal. By doing so, she joins fellow politicians
NYS Senators Daniel Squadron and Velmanette Montgomery, as well as Assemblywoman Joan Millman, who already openly support the Superfund listing of the dangerously polluted waterway.

My thanks goes out to Representative Velázquez, Squadron, Montgomery and Millman for putting the health of their constituents above all.

Lets hope that Congresswoman Yvette Clarke, still-Councilman Bill DeBlasio, Senators Schumer and Gillibrand will follow suite.

Read Velázquez's statement below:
Velázquez Urges Superfund Designation for Gowanus, Newtown

Says EPA Has Resources, Expertise to Clean Up Polluted Waterways

Washington, DC – Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez (D-N.Y.) issued the following
statement today urging the Environmental Protection Agency to complete
its review and designate the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek as federal
Superfund sites:

“Securing a healthy environment for New York City families is the single
most important factor in choosing a course of action for cleaning both
the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek. Superfund designation will
thoroughly remove hazards and transform these waterways into a source of
pride for our community.

“Among the most contaminated sites in the country, the Gowanus Canal and
Newtown Creek have threatened the health of New Yorkers for long enough
and kept these neighborhoods from realizing their full potential. With
nearly three decades of experience, the EPA has the expertise and
resources to carry out a comprehensive remediation of these sites,
creating a safe place for New Yorkers to live and work. Through the
EPA’s help, these local treasures will become a revitalized waterfront
for the people of Brooklyn.

“The Superfund program establishes an equitable process for restoring
accountability and invigorating the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek.
What we have before us is a means to fully protect the well being of New
Yorkers, as well as ensure future growth and responsible development in
our neighborhoods.

“Efforts to transform Brooklyn’s waterfront have brought the community
together and have resulted in the many innovative projects underway.
Superfund designation will complement these efforts. By working together
we will fully restore both the functionality and beauty of these sites.”

Read more

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

According To 'Crain's Insider', Patterson Is Last Hope For Gowanus Superfund Naysayers

IMG_0402



Time To Send Letters To Governor Patterson???

Crain's New York published a very interesting article on the Gowanus Canal proposed Superfunding. It's entitled: "Gov Is Last Hope For Gowanus Builders."
(If link does not work, access article here)

It's a worthwhile read.


It describes Mayor Bloomberg's opposition to the listing of the waterway as a Superfund site and his political wrangling to convince the EPA that the city's questionable, more developer-friendly alternative plan is viable. So far, he has not been successful, though he personally called and lobbied Administrator Jackson, the head of the EPA in Washington.

The article also described the hesitation of some of our elected officials, namely Representative Nydia Velázquez, who has yet to issue a statement for the Superfund listing, though she seemed to be leaning for the designation.
Representative Yvette Clarke has been mostly absent from the debate.
Senator Schumer seems to be among the fence-sitters, while Bill de Blasio has been against it from the start. (I hope you will remember that when you go to the polls for the run-off election today)
Only Daniel Squadron, our State Senator has clearly expressed his preference for letting the EPA handle the clean-up.

Which leaves Governor David Paterson, who is, according to the article: "the last hope for Superfund opponents—led by developers who say banks won't finance their projects if the canal area gets Superfund status, which can linger for decades."

None of the political maneuvering by our elected officials has anything to do with environmental science, which should be the only criteria on whether the polluted canal is worthy of being placed on the list reserved for the most polluted sites in the nation.

To access the Crain's article, click here:



To contact Governor Paterson to ask that he support the community rather than to listen to Mayor Bloomberg and developers, write, phone or email :

David A. Paterson
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224

518-474-8390

to email, click here



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Mark Your Calendar: EPA Update Meeting On Superfund On May 26th



The Waters Of The Gowanus Canal


2009-05-26 CB6 EPA meeting

Click Image To Enlage

As promised, Congresswomen Nydia Vélazquez and Yvette Clarke, together with Community Board 6, are bringing the EPA back to the neighborhood for a second informational meeting on the proposed Superfund Site designation of the Gowanus Canal.

Craig Hammerman, the District Manager for C.B.6 writes:


Greetings!

Congresswomen Velazquez and Clarke, together with the CB6 Executive and Public Safety/Environmental Protection/Permits&Licenses Committees, are pleased to host...

SUPERFUND FOR THE GOWANUS?
An informational update by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on a proposal to designate the Gowanus Canal and environs as a Superfund site.

Join us as we hear from EPA representatives directly to find out what a Superfund designation would mean for our community and learn more about the process used to make such a determination.

Meeting details, including a downloadable flyer for the event, are available by clicking here, or at the following link:
http://www.brooklyncb6.org/calendar/#26


Also, anyone wanting additional background on the Gowanus Superfund application, process, and directions for submitting public comment which is due by July 8, 2009, can click here, or visit the EPA website at the following link:
http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/gowanus/


Best, Craig

Craig R. Hammerman
District Manager
Brooklyn Community Board 6
250 Baltic Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201-6401




Read more

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Regarding Gowanus Superfund Designation, Our Local Pols Are Showing Incredible Lack Of Leadership

IMG_7649

4-17-09 EPA re Gowanus Canal Superfund extension



From the moment it was made public that the E.P.A. had proposed the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund site, our local politicians have shown an incredible lack of leadership and an amazing disregard for their constituents' health. Pardon me for asking, but are they collectively committing political suicide?

Since Walter Mugden, of the US EPA stated at a public forum two weeks ago that the Gowanus Canal was so severely polluted that it easily fit the criteria to be included on their list of Superfunds, our politicians have been spinning this as a "complex issue" that needs careful consideration.

Now, truly, what exactly is there to consider?
It is all rather simple, I think.

Our city government has neglected the canal for decades and has contributed to its pollution by allowing raw sewage to flow into its waters every time it rains. That makes the city one of the canal's biggest polluters. There is a half-hearted clean-up attempt being proposed by the city, but it was never going to dredge the whole canal to remove toxic materials. Even if it wanted to, New York City doesn't have the money anyway to do a thorough job. Instead, Mayor Bloomberg, with the support of our (mostly absent) City Councilmember Bill DeBlasio, had the glorious idea of opening up the Gowanus Canal area for residential use and allowing individual developers to clean their building sites (uplands only) themselves. What a concept: bring entire families to the shores of a terribly polluted waterway and hope for the best! Now that is real advocacy for one's constituents.

The NYS Dept. Of Environmental Conservation wanted to do a more thorough clean-up, but realized that it was too big and complex of a job, so they reached out to the federal government and asked for help. I tend to think that someone at DEC had a conscience and realized that our politicians were going to put people's lives at risk by having them live in apartments next to an open sewer, so they wisely brought in the EPA.

According to Walter Mugden of the EPA, it only took his agency one of its tests to determine that the Gowanus canal met the requirements for a Superfund site. More were not needed after the first reading. Yes, it is extremely toxic, probably more so than residents even imagined.
The EPA has stepped forward and has promised a comprehensive clean-up.

Now, one would think that our elected officials would say "Thank You Very Much For Your Help" to the EPA, but that is not the case. Mayor Bloomberg immediately announced that his administration didn't need any &%^$#@ help from the EPA. Councilmember DeBlasio was a little more subtle, but stated that the Feds would "just get in the way" of a Gowanus Canal clean-up. He opined that "You don't want to drink out of it, you don't want to eat fish out of it, but it is not a danger to live near it."
Well thank you, Professor DeBlasio!

But DeBlasio must have had a moment of self doubt when he wrote a letter to Lisa Jackson of the EPA in Washington DC on April 22nd 2009 to ask:

" Is part of the basis of the proposed designation that people eat fish caught at the mouth of the canal? Is there a clear causal link between the canal sediment and levels of toxins in fish caught in NY Harbor? Is there any other predicted risk to the health of the residents or workers along the banks of the Gowanus under normal living or working conditions now?"


Maybe, Mr.DeBlasio should have asked EPA these questions a long time ago, before he advocated rezoning the area to residential.

And how about our other elected officials?
Just today, it was announced that the EPA had extended the 60 day public comment period by an additional 30 days after Councilmember deBlasio, Assemblywoman Joan Millman and Congresswoman Nydia Vélazquez requested more time to consider the risks to our citizens which have not concerned them until now.
Ms. Millman explains her request to EPA by stating: "This is a complicated situation, with a sad history of neglect and inactivity."
Exactly my point, Ms. Millman!
Had these officials reached out to the EPA when they first took office, the canal might be clean already.
Now they are dragging this out even longer. Funny that the community never received more time to comment on the Toll Brothers' spot-rezoning. That was a 'complex' issue as well.

It sure feels as though this community is fighting its own politicians. Silly me, all this time, I thought that they were representing us.
I have written off deBlasio, but I sure hope the others will get off the fence soon and follow their conscience. And that includes newly-elected NY State Senator Daniel Squadron and Congresswoman Yvette Clarke.






For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read more