In a letter to NYC Department Of Homeless Services Commissioner Diamond, Councilmember Brad Lander, Borough President Marty Markowitz, State Senator Daniel Squadron, and Assemblywoman Joan Millman cite the lack of public process, the tight space for 170 men in the 10-unit building as well as the absence of a plan to provide social services for them.
They also question the fact that the owner of the building Charles Wertman, is also a board member of Housing Solutions USA, the non-profit proposing the shelter.
Please find the entire letter below.
October 16, 2012
Mr. Seth Diamond
CommissionerNYC Department of Homeless Services
33 Beaver Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
33 Beaver Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Dear Commissioner Diamond:
We are writing in response to the community notification received by Brooklyn Community Board 6 on Friday October 5, 2012, in which Housing Solutions USA – in partnership with the NYC Department of Homeless Services (DHS) – announced their intention to open a 170-bed homeless shelter at 165 West 9th Street, between Court Street and Hamilton Avenue, in Carroll Gardens. We have numerous concerns about the proposal.
With homelessness at all-time high, every neighborhood – including Carroll Gardens – has a role to play in making sure that all New Yorkers have a safe place to sleep at night. Safe and decent housing is essential for all of us, and we recognize that we all have to do our fair share. We recognize that it is our collective responsibility – as both a city and a community – to support the mission of the NYC Department of Homeless Services and to provide shelter for homeless New Yorkers. If DHS will work with us and our community in a collaborative fashion to develop an appropriate proposal, we are committed to supporting a shelter in Carroll Gardens.
However, that must not mean using the City’s emergency contracting provisions to rush an ill-conceived project through, with only a half-page, 30-day notice to the community, squeezing 170 people into a 10-unit building, with no plans provided for social services or security, and disregard for City rules and processes, including an apparent conflict of interest. In particular:
*We do not understand how it is possible – or advisable – to squeeze 170 people into a 10-unit building on a block of three-family homes. We have asked this question several times, and received no answer.
*The building currently has a Certificate of Occupancy as a 10-unit, Class A apartment building. No plans to amend this have been posted on the NYC Department of Buildings website. Are you aware of plans to change the C of O? No plans have been provided to us, despite several requests.
*It appears to us that construction work has been taking place in the building without a permit. No permits have been filed with DOB, or posted on their site. This appears to be a violation of law, and reflects disregard for safety and the community. If permits are in fact required, but have not been filed, work should of course be stopped immediately.
*We have seen no plans for the provision of social services or security, which are of course an essential element of any homeless shelter. It is outrageous that the 30-day notice requirement could be satisfied by a half-page letter that includes no details – not the population intended for the building, not the plans, no provision for social services, no discussion of security. This does not reflect respect for the community or its elected officials, or a genuine desire for dialogue that would enable the proposed shelter to succeed in meeting the needs of its residents or its neighbors.
*The building appears to be owned by Charles Wertman, a board member of Housing Solutions USA. Given that the City of New York will pay substantial sums for the rent of the building, this suggests a large potential conflict-of-interest. Do DHS and HSUSA have conflicts-of-interest policies that are in accordance with relevant laws? Are these rules affected in some way by the emergency contract process?
Since you are providing the community with only a 30-day notice that is completely lacking in detail, we ask that you provide written responses to our concerns by the close of business on Friday, October 19.
We are aware that Housing Solutions USA has agreed to make a presentation at the Brooklyn Community Board 6 Human Services Committee meeting on Thursday October 24. DHS must also send a representative to attend this meeting.
We are aware that Housing Solutions USA has agreed to make a presentation at the Brooklyn Community Board 6 Human Services Committee meeting on Thursday October 24. DHS must also send a representative to attend this meeting.
Sincerely,
Marty Markowitz, Brooklyn Borough President
Daniel Squadron, NYState Senator
Joan Millman, NY State Assemblywoman
Brad Lander, NY City Councilmember
****A quick correction to the date for the presentation mentioned in the letter. The meeting is actually next week on Wednesday, October 24.
What do you think of the letter?
What do you think of the letter?
.JPG)
9 comments:
Correction again: it is next Wednesday, October 24th.
Thank you to all of the signatories of this letter for standing up for our neighborhood. As Brooklynites, they all know that this borough is home to the most wonderful, most open-minded people. We're not suckers, however. And we know a raw deal that tries to capitalize on the backs of the less fortunate when we see one.
It is utterly disgusting to imagine people in need being managed like cash cows with the help of our tax payer money.
Somebody is going to need a hell of lawyer to come up with answers to those questions.
Thanks, Anon #1. Don't now what happened there.
I just changed it.
While this seems to be a step in the right direction, let's not forget that DHS has no obligation to listen to elected officials under the emergency dictate.
Work is still going on at the site and dozens of bed frames have been put together and stacked outside at the back of the building.
It is as crucial as ever to sign the petition here and to attend the CB6 meeting on Wednesday October 24, 6:30pm at PS58
MAJOR Corruption involved here. The usual players.
No surprise. "Done deal" blah blah blah
Is the opposition really just because of the way they are going about it or because no one wants a homeless shelter in their neighborhood regardless of the circumstances? I'm not out right dismissing the concerns but they all seem to be ignoring the elephant in the room, people just don't like living near homeless shelters.
I'm with Rob! The fact is that it will bring a less desireable element into the neighborhood. Especialy when all those "urban professionals" just spent a pretty penny buying condos on court and 9th. I'm sure they're not going to be happy about it.
Charles Wertman should also purchase 100 Luquer Street for affordable housing! Members of our Community Board want housing with 30% affordable units so they will stand up and applaud at the meeting next week.
Post a Comment