's Landmarks/Land Use meeting on Thursday, October 22 at 6pm. According to CB6, "
. I would encourage everyone in the community to sign up, to send in your questions and
, but better yet, to demand to make a statement.
target Gowanus for one of the largest upzonings during this administration, local residents demand a plan that offers safety, sustainability, transparency and respect for our residential neighborhood and our businesses. Currently, De Blasio and Lander's vision offers none of the above.
-The Gowanus neighborhood is a very fragile ecological environment and coastal estuary that has been abused for more than a century.
-Brownfield remediations are toxic containment measures and not actual cleanups. Much of the highly toxic material in the canal and adjacent land will remain in the soil even after EPA Superfund and Brownfield remediation efforts have been completed. And because of the real risks that come from living on land that remains polluted in perpetuity, NY State mandates these sites be monitored for exposure risks every year.
-New York City is one of the main polluters of the Gowanus Canal because it dumps both toxic materials and organic pathogens into the canal during rain fall events. EPA will restrict CSO toxic materials, but what of the pathogens?
-New York State allows the city to use a loophole in the Clean Water Act for industrial waterways. In most city waterways Combined Sewer discharges must be restricted to maintain low levels of pathogen present in the water, as mandated by NY State water standards. This is not so in Gowanus, where the industrial water-quality classification sets no limits to the levels of pathogens allowed to flow in this canal.
-Gowanus is prone to flooding, from both urban drainage during rainfall and coastal storm surges as with Hurricane Sandy. Flooding will become more severe due to climate change and ensuing sea levels rise.Resilience measures that elevate the banks of the canal can be expectedtoexacerbate flooding and ground water levels in surrounding upland areas.
-As one of the City's first industrial areas, Gowanus is home to many vital businesses for New Yorkers. Manufacturing jobs pay much more than service industry jobs. These businesses want to stay, thrive, and grow in Gowanus. We need them here.
-Gowanus has provides spaces for small business where new ideas can grow. Gowanus is home to many new recreational and arts enterprises because of it' unique location, buildings, and community.
-The Gowanus/Brooklyn area needs more green, open space. Gowanus and adjacent communities are substantially underserved by public open space and have been since Dept. of City Planning stated in 1978, and the Parks Department re-affirmed most recently.
-Gowanus has been targeted by developers since 2006 and land speculation has displaced many residents and businesses during this time.
-During Brad Lander's 11 years as our representatives in the Council, the proposed original 2008 rezoning has almost doubled in density and height.
In light of all these facts, the Gowanus Community needs to demand:
-an immediate moratorium on the Gowanus rezoning until such time that in-person public meetings can resume and offer Gowanus residents the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) they are entitled to by law.
-an urban planning process that is driven by community needs and respectful of the environmental realities in Gowanus, not developer profits.
-a racial impact study ahead of any ULURP action.
-that the EPA Superfund clean-up of the canal be completed first.
-that the City comply with the Clean Water Act. NYC DEP must correctly size and complete the two Combined Sewer Overflow tanks mandated by EPA so that zero sewage discharges into the canal.
-that NYS DEC reclassify the Gowanus canal waterway to a standard appropriate for adjacent residential use, and so place mandatory limits on pathogen levels in the water, before permitting residential development along the banks of the canal.
-that only land that can be remediated 100% to support healthy human habitation receive residential use-designation.
-a commitment that the entire 5.8 acre former MGP site known as Public Place be set aside under its current restrictive 'recreational use' and be made available to the community as open parkland.
-that no new Gowanus buildings be included in the ~25 year 421-A tax abatement program. Every building should pay a fair share for our infrastructure and city services.
-that Gowanus developers not shift liability for building onto toxic land on taxpayers through the Brownfield program.
-Transparency in decision making by our electeds and the City. We demand to know who received campaign contributions or was targeted by lobbyist in regards to the rezoning.
-Resistance to climate change and other environmental principles should be made a priority in any land-use decision
-All land-use changes must be carbon-neutral.
-Everyone deserves to live on land that is safe and resilient to climate change; no one should be expected to live on land that poses any danger to human health, or is susceptible to loss from climate change.
.JPG)
