Showing posts with label Bridging Gowanus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bridging Gowanus. Show all posts

Friday, September 23, 2016

Apartments At '365 Bond' Luxury Building In Gowanus Now Listed On Craig's List

IMG_9361 1
As seen from the Carroll Street Bridge, 365 Bond Street in background, 363 Bond Street in foreground
IMG_9339
365 Bond Street at First Street
IMG_9342 1
At Second Street
IMG_9341 1
IMG_9340

365 Bond Street apartment listings on Craig's List

Pardon me for asking, but doesn't it seem a bit surprising that 365 Bond Street, the 12-story rental development by Lightstone Group in Gowanus, has felt the need to advertise its apartments on Craig's List?  The developer is now offering a month free, 'end of summer specials', and telling people to ask about 'incentive information' on the building's own site.  Could this be an indication that, perhaps, the units in this building are not renting out as fast as anticipated?

Just search Craig's List for 'apartments for rent' in Gowanus (or Carroll Gardens) and you will come across quite a few listings for units at 365 Bond Street.

The luxury rental development on the shore of the Gowanus Canal, an EPA Superfund, was completed in early 2016. Of the 430 apartments in the building, 83 were set aside as 'affordable'.  The market rate apartments were offered for rent this past March through Douglass Elliman, which operates a  'leasing gallery' right inside the building.  By the beginning of April, the first tenants moved in.

The rent for the apartments currently available range from $2,483 a month for a studio apartment to over $6,800 for a two bedroom with a terrace.  Yes, the apartments are very nice, but the rooms are rather small.  The amenities in the building are awesome, but perhaps not enough to justify the rental price?

We keep on hearing from our politicians (and developers) that there is a huge deficit of apartments in the area. If that is the case, one would imagine that the building would have been fully rented by now and that the developer would not need to offer rental incentives.

More apartments will be available in Gowanus in the near future. Just next door to 365 Bond Street, a 12-story sister building at 363 Bond Street will be completed in 2017.  It will add another 268 units to the development complex.

Councilman Brad Lander has been pushing hard for an overall rezoning of the Gowanus Canal corridor from mostly manufacturing to mixed use, which will open the floodgates to more residential developments similar or even larger that the Lightstone development.  That will mean thousands of new apartments may soon come on the market in Gowanus.
That's rather ambitious for a neighborhood that sits squarely in a flood zone and includes one of the most toxic waterways in all of the United States. An environmental clean-up of the Gowanus Canal is planned, but is still years away from completion.

In the meantime, those adventurous enough to move into these new buildings will have to deal with foul odors emanating from the canal and with rats, as it would appear.  As the photos below show,  rodent bait stations have been place every few feet along the circumference of 365 Bond Street.

***And one more thing:  I have heard that those who won the lottery for one of the 83 affordable apartment units at 365 Bond Street have not been allowed to move into the building yet.  Apparently, Lightsone is waiting to fill all the market rate units before letting the lottery winners move into the building.
Is that correct? Can someone shed some light on this rumor?

IMG_9353
Rat baiting stations surrounding 365 Bond Street
IMG_9346 1
IMG_9345 1



Read more

Saturday, June 18, 2016

How Shameful! Without Public Announcement, Councilmember Lander 'Stepping Up' Gowanus Community Planning Process

IMG_7135
IMG_6754
15607330045_2923aebe24_z
Councilman Brad Lander at one of the Bridging Gowanus meetings, promising an 'inclusive and transparent process"
Bridging Gowanus Study Area

Unbeknown to most Gowanus residents and business owners, Councilman Brad Lander has recently
"stepped up a handful of meetings with local leaders in the Gowanus neighborhood to talk with them about next steps in the Bridging Gowanus community planning process," according to Catherine Zinnel, his Deputy Chief of Staff.
I found out about Bridging Gowanus' next steps by pure coincidence when someone whose organization had been invited by Lander's office mentioned a meeting on June 16th with the  representatives from the NYC Department of City Planning.  Obviously, the person thought he had committed a gaffe, since as soon as the words were spoken, he tried to back paddle and asked me repeatedly, in a strong tone, not to call Brad Lander's office to find out more.

Obviously, that person does not know me very well.
That same evening, I reached out to Ms. Zinnel to inquire about the meeting.  She acknowledged that Gowanus Canal Conservancy and Gowanus by Design 'among others' would be attending together with City Planning staff.  
The purpose for the gathering, according to Zinnel, was to discuss the next steps in the Bridging Gowanus community planning process and to talk about what progress "has been made over the past 18 months on some of the recommendations" made by the community during previous Bridging Gowanus meetings.
When asked to provide a complete list of attendees, Zinnel did not oblige, even after the meeting.***
( From another source, I learned that, along with NYC Department of City Planning, representatives of Gowanus Canal Conservancy, Gowanus Dredgers, Gowanus by Design, Build It Green, and the LES Ecology Center had received an invitation.)

Why is any of this important?
Of course, our Councilman can have meetings with whomever he chooses but it should be part of the public record so there is no suspicion about motives.  We are talking here about the overall rezoning of the Gowanus neighborhood and the meetings associated with this re-zoning should be made public.

When Councilman Lander, together with several other local elected officials, launched Bridging Gowanus, a conversation "about a shared, sustainable vision for the Gowanus" in August 2013, he promised the community a "broad-based, inclusive, transparent and robust process," and vowed "to make sure that the communities around the Canal could take the lead in identifying the values that will shape future actions."

That first Gowanus Planning kick-off meeting held on August 5, 2013, didn't seem so inclusive to some. Though various stakeholders and representatives from local organizations had been invited, the meeting was not announced to the public, not posted in any way on the internet, not open to the general public and was closed to the press.

Councilman Brad Lander, when faced with the criticism in the press, wrote a letter to the editor of the Brooklyn Paper stating that the meeting 'was not secret' and promised that Bridging Gowanus would
"be an effort to open up the planning process so that community residents, business people, and community groups can work together to shape a vision for the area around the Gowanus Canal rather than have decisions made by developers, the city, or by elected officials."

Subsequent Bridging Gowanus meetings held throughout 2014 were indeed publicized and well attended.  However,  the meetings were eerily controlled and orchestrated by Pratt Center for Community Development, which had been hired by Lander as consultant in charge of running the planning process.
Participants were divided amongst several tables where Pratt Center moderators seemed to lead the conversation according to a carefully scripted plan that led to a pre-determined outcome,  It all seemed designed to give the appearance of community input rather than to actually achieve it.

In November 2014, Pratt Center for Community Development presented the findings of the "Bridging Gowanus." These findings, the community was told, would help develop a neighborhood framework for "the infrastructure and land use plan needed for a safe, vibrant and sustainable Gowanus." The 'shared values' reflected in the framework are "going to hopefully guide New York City Planning and the De Blasio Administration when a re-zoning plan for Gowanus will be put forth."

Though groups and organizations like the Fifth Avenue Committee, Gowanus Alliance, Gowanus Dredgers, and Wyckoff Gardens Tenants Association expressed their approval of the framework, quite a few local residents objected to the assertion by Pratt and Councilman Lander that many in Gowanus were open to high rises from 8 to 18 stories to achieve the goals set forth by Bridging Gowanus.
The density had been determined by a rather misleading exercise given to residents at the public meeting in June which asked residents to add two stories to a four story building for every amenity, like school, park or art space, that would be added to the neighborhood. Those who checked off every amenity ended up with residential buildings up to 18 stories high.

To Lander, it was all a trade off for providing more parkland, more schools, more affordable housing and protection of manufacturing zones in Gowanus.
"We did ask people to think hard of the tradeoffs that are necessary," Brad Lander commented. "These kinds of investments and achieving the level of preservation we just talked about costs a lot of money."

It is interesting to note that 'Bridging Gowanus' is not the first time the community was asked to envision the future of the neighborhood. Back in 2007, Pratt Center helped convene Gowanus Summit, "a coalition of civic, housing and community development, manufacturing, and labor groups to establish ground rules for development around the Gowanus Canal."
The summit "aimed to ensure that new development meets the needs of area residents and sets high standards for local quality of life."
Even more interesting, Brad Lander was the director for Pratt Center for Community Development in 2007.

Shortly afterwards, in May 2008, while Bill de Blasio was our councilman, the New York City Department of City Planning released its Gowanus Canal Corridor Draft Zoning Proposal The agency was ready to push a major re-zoning through, though there was much opposition from the community.
That re-zoning effort was eventually put on hold after the Environmental Protection Agency declared the Gowanus Canal a Superfund in 2009.

The prospect of a re-zoning has caused developers to circle around the neighborhood like sharks in a feeding frenzy. Since 2008, most of the land around the Gowanus Canal has been snapped up in a veritable gold rush.  But before that land is re-zoned from manufacturing to residential, they can't start building their luxury condos.
Developers are probably calling our elected officials on a regular basis to apply pressure (or, perhaps to host fundraisers and contribute to campaigns).

Which brings me back to last Thursday's meeting.
After all his promises and assurances that the Bridging Gowanus process and subsequent re-zoning will be transparent and inclusive, Councilman Brad Lander should know better than to 'step up' the process without announcing it to the community.
Shame on him.


***As of this morning, Catheribe Zinnel of Lander's office had not provided the requested attendance list for last Thursday's meeting.  Nor did she provide a list of attendees of another 'Bridging Gowanus Part 2' meeting that took place earlier on Thursday.





Read more

Monday, February 23, 2015

Councilman Lander To Present "Bridging Gowanus" Planning Framework At Gowanus Canal Superfund CAG Meeting

IMG_2745
Councilmember Brad Lander will be attending this Tuesday's Gowanus Canal Superfund Community Advisory Group (CAG) meeting to present the result of Bridging Gowanus, his initiative to "develop a neighborhood framework for the infrastructure and land use plan needed for a safe, vibrant and sustainable Gowanus".

Though the Councilmember had met with many community groups to share the final "Draft Bridging Gowanus Community Planning Framework" in the weeks prior to its November 2014 release, he had somehow failed to meet with the CAG.

At its December 2014 general meeting, the CAG, which has been working closely with the Environmental Protection Agency to keep the community information on issues relating to the canal's Superfund clean-up, asked for the Councilman to come present the framework to its members. It also asked that the Bridging Gowanus comment period be extended so that the CAG has time to formulate a response.

Tuesday's CAG meeting is open to the community. I urge everyone to attend.
Since the 'shared values' reflected in the Bridging Gowanus framework are meant to guide New York City Planning and the De Blasio Administration when a re-zoning plan for Gowanus will be put worth, it will have a huge impact on the future of the community.

Gowanus Canal CAG Meeting
Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 6:30 PM
Mary Star of The Sea Senior Apartments, 41 1st Street, Brooklyn



Read more

Monday, February 09, 2015

Gowanus Canal Superfund Community Advisory Group To Meet Tomorrow And On February 24

IMG_2933
The Gowanus Canal Superfund Community Advisory Committee (CAG) will be meeting tomorrow evening February 10th at 6:30 at Mary Star of the Sea Senior Center, 41 First Street.

Representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency will be on hand to give an update on upcoming activities on the Canal.
The CAG's Water Quality/Technical Committee will also be discussing its response to NY State's Department of Environmental Conservation's proposed amendments to 6 NYCRR Parts 701 and 703 for Class I and Class SD waters regarding Class 1 and SD waterways to meet the "swimmable" goal of the federal Clean Water Act.
These proposed amendments will have a positive impact on the Gowanus Canal.

The CAG will also be holding a meeting on February 24 at 6:30 (location to be announced)
Councilmember Brad Lander will present the results of "Bridging Gowanus", a  proposed framework for the future development of the Gowanus area.

All CAG meetings are open to the community and I urge everyone to attend.


Read more

Tuesday, December 09, 2014

Nor'Easter Brings More Flooding To Gowanus (And Lightstone Group Development)

IMG_2186
Gowanus Canal at the Carroll Street Bridge just past high tide today
IMG_2187
IMG_2189
IMG_2190
IMG_2195
Looking at the Union Street Bridge
IMG_2194
Gowanus Canal coming close to breaching its banks at noon today 
IMG_2196
IMG_2203
End of 2nd Street near the canal
IMG_2205
IMG_2224
At 3rd Street Bridge.  Whole Foods parking lot
IMG_2193
Lightstone Group's development on the banks of the Gowanus Canal at 363-365 Bond Street
IMG_2202
IMG_2198
water rising at Lightstone Group's  363 Bond Street site
IMG_2200
IMG_2199
IMG_2210
Lighststone site at 365 Bond Street.  Water surrounds the foundation of the building
IMG_2209
IMG_2211
Lighstone site at 365 Bond Street.

Today's Nor'Easter has drenched the area and brought more flooding to the Gowanus area. I ventured out with an umbrella and my camera about noon today in the pouring rain to take a walk across the Gowanus Canal.
It was just past high tide, and in some areas, the water was starting to come over the banks of the canal.

The site of Lightstone Group's 700 unit rental development at 363-365 Bond Street in particular seemed to be flooded. As crews were continuing to work on the site through the heavy downpour, water from the canal was surrounding the foundation of the building at the 365 Bond Street site near Second Street. It actually seemed as though there was a moat around it.
I talked to a worker who was taking a cigarette break nearby, who confirmed that the water was rising on the site. "They have to figure out what to do," he told me,"because that canal is dangerous."


As usual, there was flooding at the 3rd Street Bridge near Whole Foods.  However, the water does not come from the Gowanus, but pools in that location as rainwater flows down the street from the higher point at Smith Street

Since the rain is supposed to continue all through the day, flooding will probably be worse tonight at 11:30 PM tonight as high tide returns.

IMG_2218
Flooding at Third Street Bridge
IMG_2217
IMG_2222
IMG_2221





Read more

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Where To From Here?: Notes From Last Night's Final Bridging Gowanus Meeting

IMG_2037
IMG_2040
IMG_2046
Council Member Brad Lander
IMG_2051
Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez
IMG_2053
Council Member Carlos Menchaca
IMG_2079
Councilmember Steve Levin
IMG_2054
IMG_2059
IMG_2064
IMG_2063
IMG_2088
Charlene Nimmons, President of Wyckoff Gardens Tenants Association
IMG_2082
Linda Mariano, member of Friends and Residents of Greater Gowanus
IMG_2090
Gowanus Resident Carl Teitelbaum
IMG_2095
Adam, Gowanus Resident
IMG_2094
Joseph Alexiou of Gowanus Preservation Society

This past Friday, Council member Brad Lander and Pratt Center For Community Development released the result of Bridging Gowanus, an initiative to "develop a neighborhood framework for the infrastructure and land use plan needed for a safe, vibrant and sustainable Gowanus."
Last night, Lander, together with Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez and Council members Carlos Menchaca and Steve Levin, presented the framework to the public.

Bridging Gowanus has been touted as a community driven process that reflects the collective priorities of the community. The 'shared values' reflected in the framework are going to hopefully guide New York City Planning and the De Blasio Administration when a re-zoning plan for Gowanus will be put forth.

Though groups and organizations like the Fifth Avenue Committee, Gowanus Alliance, Gowanus Dredgers, and Wyckoff Gardens Tenants Association expressed their approval of the framework, quite a few local residents objected to the assertion by Pratt and Lander that many in Gowanus were open to high rises from 8 to 18 stories to achieve the goals set forth by Bridging Gowanus.
The density was determined by a rather leading exercise given to residents at the public meeting in June which asked residents to add two stories to a four story building for every amenity, like school, park or art space, that would be added to the neighborhood. Those who checked off every amenity ended up with 18 story buildings.

"I doubt very much that actual Gowanus residents would like to see buildings of that height", resident Linda Mariano stated during the public comment period  last night.  She asked for a show of hand.  Only three or four people in the audience raised theirs.

Elena Conti of Pratt Institute was quick to explain that  range of height of a hypothetical 8 to 18 stories represents a range of hypothetical height.  "That is NOT a recommendation. [Bridging Gowanus] is a framework.  There is no map.  This is NOT a plan."

Some Gowanus residents expressed deep skepticism about how Bridging Gowanus can influence any future zoning plan.  This is after all, a neighborhood that has seen its fair share of broken promises.
Some residents wanted to know what the next step will be.  They also asked how our politicians will be accountable.
Gowanus resident Adam expressed this doubt best.
"There is a lot of skepticism in this room, built on experience about broken promises and generation after generation of bait-and switch in the City of New York.  There will always be pressure .  There will always be political leverage that belongs to the interest of real estate speculation and development, many of which are represented here tonight and would probably not object to 18-story buildings.  We have a unique moment in which we have progressive leadership representing us, in Brad and his colleagues in the Council, and in the support from our State and Federal representatives.  I guess the question is :  What are the strategies that our representatives are going to use to take this framework and prevent it from being something that just goes to City Planning and they say "yea, 18 stories, that sounds great", and run it through the Council and get our mayor, who supported Lightstone to support this.  Where is our leverage? How is it going to work?"

Elena Conti answered: "If this framework moves forward and the City engages the community, a very thoughtful and detailed  block by block second conversation needs to to take place. Whatever plan eventually comes forth, we need to have those more detailed conversations."

Councilman Brad Lander suggested that it would not have been smart for him and other elected officials to engage the community in a conversation about the future of their neighborhood and then to allow a zoning process that would not take the shared goals into consideration.
He reminded everyone that any re-zoning plan would first need to be approved by the City Council, which defers to the local elected in such matters.

Congressmember Nydia Velázquez added:
"We are trying to be honest, we are trying to be constructive and pro-active and not re-acting to one developer here and one developer there.  When I was told by the Bloomberg administration and the mayor himself to back off on the designation of the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund, I told him and some of the people that were pressuring me,  that I wanted the process to be determined by science and not by the mayor or any developer. I will not lend my support [to Bridging Gowanus]  if I feel in any way that the community's desire and priorities are not reflected in this process.  I can assure you."

In other words, it is important that we keep engaged, ask questions and keep our elected officials accountable.


Have you taken the time to look at the Bridging Gowanus framework?  Where you there last night? What did you think? Do you believe that the community driven process will truly have an impact on City Planning and the deBlasio administration? Let's have a real, unfiltered community conversation about our neighborhood's future.


Read more